From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 20:55:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9138D1065672 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin@kreamer.org) Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1558FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so3449071gwj.36 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.6.9 with SMTP id 9mr2050057anf.208.1292185758999; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:29:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.210.14 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:28:58 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Kreamer Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:28:58 -0500 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:22:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Security updates for packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:55:04 -0000 Hi, Having not used FreeBSD for several years, I did a fresh install yesterday of 8.1-RELEASE, and then used pkg_add -r to install several packages. I then came across portaudit, ran it, and it indicated that I had three vulnerable packages (git, ruby, and sudo). Looking at http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/, it appears that these were reported in July, August, and September respectively. Basically, I would think a freshly installed system would not have security vulnerabilities from months prior. Is that an erroneous assumption on my part, am I just misunderstanding something, or do I have something misconfigured? Do only ports get security updates, and not packages? Or is this related to the fact that I picked RELEASE, versus CURRENT or STABLE? Thanks, Kevin