From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 13 23:04:11 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA26028
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 23:04:11 -0700
Received: from mramirez.sy.yale.edu (mramirez.sy.yale.edu [130.132.57.207])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA26021
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 23:04:07 -0700
Received: (from mrami@localhost) by mramirez.sy.yale.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id CAA18190; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 02:01:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 02:01:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Ramirez <mrami@mramirez.sy.yale.edu>
Reply-To: mrami@minerva.cis.yale.edu
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: Marty Leisner <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>, root@synthcom.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: DOS Emulation under FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <199510132308.QAA18469@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951014020018.373F-100000@mramirez.sy.yale.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 13 Oct 1995, Terry Lambert wrote:

> I think there is room for a large contribution at the DOSEMU level,
> both in making it work better on BSD and in virtual machine abstraction
> on the order of the WIn95/WinNT interface.

Does this imply that DOSEMU works partially on FreeBSD?

Marc.