From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Mar 17 11: 2: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF66337B718; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:02:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2HJ1pE27520; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:01:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:01:51 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, drosih@rpi.edu, tlambert@primenet.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' Message-ID: <20010317110151.B29888@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010316140408.N29888@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010316164306W.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010316170755.S29888@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010316173711J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010316173711J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:37:11PM -0800 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jordan Hubbard [010316 17:38] wrote: > That would be really gross. Have you lost your marbles? :) I'm guessing you're upset about the build checking with newvers.sh? Why is this a problem? It seems like if I implemented what I said (barfing on interactive installs during BETA period unless a variable is set) it would prevent foot shooting and stupid questions while still allowing for the -BETA testing period for ports people. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message