From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jun  7 07:49:41 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA21573
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 07:49:41 -0700
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA21566
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 07:49:27 -0700
Received: (from imb@localhost)
	by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD4.4)
	id AAA12293; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 00:48:52 +1000
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199506071448.AAA12293@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: silo overflows
To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 00:48:52 +1000 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506071435.AAA21380@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 8, 95 00:35:27 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 420       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Bruce Evans writes:

> > .. is all that's necessary. If at all possible, site-dependent "hacks"
> >should be kept out of the kernel sources.
 
> I prefer `comcontrol /dev/ttydX ftl N', but there is no time to implement
> this for 2.0.5.
 
Agreed and far more consistent.

> Do you want a barely documented option in 2.0.5 if the option will become
> obsolete in 2.0.6?

Nope .. your way is great, thanks :-)

	michael