From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jun 17 05:59:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA15586
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 05:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veda.is (root@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA15581;
          Mon, 17 Jun 1996 05:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09802; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 12:52:33 GMT
From: Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Message-Id: <199606171252.MAA09802@veda.is>
Subject: Re: review: ftpget final source
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 12:52:25 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: peter@spinner.dialix.com, committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org,
        jmz@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199606170911.CAA04807@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Jun 17, 96 02:11:35 am"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> You know what, before posting the original message, I thought (hard)
> if there is a better name.  The only ones I came up was "netget" and
> "fetch".  I was afraid I'll be laughed off the list so I just used
> "ftpget" for the time being.

Go ahead and laugh :)   what _is_ wrong with fetch?
In the context, it hardly refers to gastronomics.

--
Adam David <adam@veda.is>