From owner-freebsd-audit Mon Jun 18 11:34:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A6C37B401; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA50811; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:34:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Kris Kennaway Cc: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/rarpd Makefile rarpd.8 rarpd.c References: <200106180648.f5I6mXw73601@freefall.freebsd.org> <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 18 Jun 2001 20:34:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway writes: > -audit has turned into the defacto code review mailing list, though it > was originalliy intended only for security audits. Is it really > necessary to send patches to two mailing lists? How about setting up a -review list for general code review, and trying to keep -audit more or less focused on reviews and audits of security-sensitive code? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message