Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:02:46 +0100
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r244533 - in projects/calloutng: share/man/man9 sys/dev/atkbdc sys/dev/random sys/dev/syscons sys/kern sys/sys
Message-ID:  <CAJ-FndAGHs0dYKmRqXiHA8uR=obW9WVcdqq8zS1Yjbn9Xi3A3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACYV=-FLsfP4nJaVYvY76Eda42jgCBJ8Qe3KeuERkGXYsfHd7g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201212211108.qBLB8jwa047382@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmokHDoPwO57tgyU_quKjVzEZ1wgZd2w=RxXtgMxSEJRY8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACYV=-FLsfP4nJaVYvY76Eda42jgCBJ8Qe3KeuERkGXYsfHd7g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There's a DELAY (bt.frac >> 44) there; please write or use a
>> BINTIME_TO_USEC macro instead?
>>
>> Since you're touching kqueue, do you guys have a testing plan for
>> verifying kqueue operation is still working right?
>>
>
> I do think web servers -- as well as tons of other applications use it.
> Other than that, the commit doesn't change kqueue() semantics.

This test by gianni@ was very good at finding callout races in the past:
http://people.freebsd.org/~attilio/callout/test.c

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndAGHs0dYKmRqXiHA8uR=obW9WVcdqq8zS1Yjbn9Xi3A3A>