Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 22:53:56 +0100 (MET) From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Subject: Re: Hmmmm! `resvport' keyword not documented *anywhere*? Message-ID: <199511042153.WAA21230@allegro.lemis.de> In-Reply-To: <9511042130.AA07558@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Nov 4, 95 04:30:03 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett A. Wollman writes: > > <<On Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:27:04 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said: > > >> > And the mount_nfs man page does not describe how to put FS specific > >> > mount options into the fstab. 8-(. > >> > >> The same way as you would on the `mount' command line, with the > >> exception that `ro' or `rw' must come first. > > > You mean as dash options. > > > This begs the question of "why have undocumented word options at all?". > > For backward compatibility. Then document them as obsolete, or, if that's too unpleasant, call them "deprecated". There's a nice Berkeley word for you. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511042153.WAA21230>