From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 12 16:15:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F8116A417 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A5B13C459 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia-2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD798E02B3; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:15:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:15:28 -0700 From: cpghost To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20080212161528.GB94543@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20080211171152.S4377@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080211173958.W4493@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200802120307.m1C376AX007592@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20080212075434.S1566@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080212075434.S1566@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: Olivier Nicole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HTTP POST X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:31 -0000 On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:57:14AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> If it is the bytes on the network, I have no answer. > > bytes on network. i want to write my own www server, actually i already > wrote, with working everything except post. It is definitely fun, but why won't you use www/lighttpd instead? Lighty is an excellent super fast web server with an extremely small memory footprint. I fell in love with it a few years ago, and migrated most Apache-based sites I manage to it, because they don't need all the extra bells and whistles. > things got much nicer than using apache+cgi, it's 100 times simpler and > faster to have it all in single program > > when it will have this tested, i will make cutdown version just to serve > static pages, to replace apache in 95% of cases :) That's exactly where lighttpd excels at: serving static content very efficiently, even for very high bandwidth sites. ;) Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/