From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 16 17:21:35 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA25398 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 17:21:35 -0700 Received: from kryten.atinc.com (kryten.atinc.com [198.138.38.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA25390 ; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 17:21:30 -0700 Received: (jmb@localhost) by kryten.atinc.com (8.6.9/8.3) id UAA11043; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 20:17:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 20:17:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Subject: Re: SIGNOF REDES-L To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: jkh@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199506162316.QAA06165@ref.tfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 16 Jun 1995, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > However, in order to prevent such a thing from happening again I > > > believe it will be best if we simply block all incoming email from > > > mixit.ansp.br in the future. Jonathan, if you'll do the honors? > > > Thanks.. > > > > i have rude code installed, commented out, ready to go. i want > > to improve this to return a message explaining why. it will be ready for > Of course you will only send max one message per day or something similar > right ? > > We're not aiming for a new loop here I hope ! no, no nes loops. or at least no loop that will reach us. when one of THEIRS arrives, an explaination returns to them as to why it wa rejected. majordomo checks messages that it forwards, preventing the creation of a majordomo loop. now a list proc -> majordomo (ours) -> explain -> list proc (theirs ) -> majordomo (ours) , drops the message. Jonathan M. Bresler jmb@kryten.atinc.com | Analysis & Technology, Inc. | 2341 Jeff Davis Hwy play go. | Arlington, VA 22202 ride bike. hack FreeBSD.--ah the good life | 703-418-2800 x346