From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 25 23:14:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA22172 for emulation-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:14:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gbdata.com (USR1-1.detnet.com [207.113.12.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA22163 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:14:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gclarkii@localhost) by main.gbdata.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA00242 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 01:14:30 -0600 (CST) From: Gary Clark II Message-Id: <199703260714.BAA00242@main.gbdata.com> Subject: Latest doscmd report To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 01:14:30 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I grabbed the latest doscmd stuff and recompiled a kernel and rebooted. Two of the three test programs run fine (ls.exe and zip.exe). The other one (q.exe) kept giving me a message about something being unimplemented except in X mode (this was with the -x switch). Next time I boot this kernel I'll copy it down..:( I've never used BSDI before, but is this atleast as stable as their doscmd system? If so, is there any reason not to get this into current? I'm running a current from right before the lite2 deluge. Next I'm going to try and get one of my old c-compilers to run (It is a latice C, used for NCR 2127 POS systems user exits). This would not run under pcemu, even though it would run on a real XT (IBM type). Gary -- Gary Clark II (N5VMF) | I speak only for myself and "maybe" my company gclarkii@GBData.COM | Member of the FreeBSD Doc Team Providing Internet and ISP startups - http://WWW.GBData.com for information FreeBSD FAQ at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/docs/FAQ.latin1