Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 03:44:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.Org (FreeBSD current) Subject: Re: Crypt code summary(2). Message-ID: <199506261044.DAA03691@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199506260920.LAA12300@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Jun 26, 95 11:20:11 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[CC: trimmed, it was getting rather long :-)] > > > I am going to counter Poul, and agree with Garrett, and give reasons > > for doing so. > > ...and I am going to debate this too! > > > a) It is very likely to change as RFC's get done to cover this and > > we will more or less be forced to rip out what ever we had done > > to implement what is in the RFCs. > > The SSLeay code is already covered by RFC's. See rfc1421, rfc1422, rfc1423 > and rfc1424. Oh, I did not realize that (gee, blush, time to go read the RFC index since the last time I looked it over for what was new the RFS's where only in the 1200's or so :-(). > > b) This is cryto code and may have legal ramifications that none of > > us have fully evaluated (and I wouldn't consider it fully evaluated > > until some one has consulted with the State Department and/or an > > attourny (didn't we have some one once offer us free or low cost > > legal counsel??). > > Do US embassies have PR State Department folks I could ask? Don't know. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506261044.DAA03691>