Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:28:28 -0800 From: Dustin Harris <dustinh@webtrends.com> To: 'Doug White' <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, Mikhail Kononenko <mikhail@samovar.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: EtherExpress100 on Intel Easton Message-ID: <0145F0769FECD411BF8400508BFDF6E4048E80@newman.internal.webtrends.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
There is usually a newer eepro100 driver at the maintainer's site than what is distributed in the kernel source (ftp://ftp.scyld.com/pub/network/test/eepro100.c). --dustin -----Original Message----- From: Doug White [mailto:dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:18 PM To: Mikhail Kononenko Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EtherExpress100 on Intel Easton On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Mikhail Kononenko wrote: > Sorry, if this is offtopic here, but I could not get answer from native > lists... > > Linux kernel-2.2.17 on D815EEAL (with integrated NIC). The driver used: > eepro100. Traditionally, the Linux Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 drivers have, quite frankly, sucked. This is a known problem with no solution. This is counter to FreeBSD, where the fxp driver is one of the best ethernet drivers in the system :-) Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0145F0769FECD411BF8400508BFDF6E4048E80>