From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sun Oct 15 22:31:31 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C61E4C655
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:31:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0155D63461
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:31:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id F1D07E4C654; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:31:30 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1734E4C653
 for <ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:31:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com)
Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1DC63460;
 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:31:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com)
Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-73-240-250-185.hsd1.or.comcast.net
 [73.240.250.185])
 by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0530D38F48;
 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:fe80::7102:4df8:1f13:5c55] (unknown
 [IPv6:fe80::7102:4df8:1f13:5c55])
 by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE1471AE8;
 Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Why ports are allowed to be linked with base OpenSSL?
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
References: <de742cb7-34e5-97d2-b12b-eb764682327e@rawbw.com>
 <20171015184133.qw342awio6svrw7v@ivaldir.net>
From: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
Message-ID: <454e2110-9a36-c9f3-e102-ff538abbd616@bluerosetech.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:31:29 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171015184133.qw342awio6svrw7v@ivaldir.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:31:31 -0000

On 10/15/2017 11:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:15:24PM +0000, Yuri wrote:
>> Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed here
>> before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with
>> SSL_DEFAULT=base, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=openssl, this will obviously
>> cause conflicts when two incompatible openssl libraries will be mapped into
>> the same process.
>>
>>
>> Isn't it better to only allow port OpenSSL for ports, and disallow base
>> OpenSSL in ports, so that there will be homogeneity of openssl?
>>
> 
> First the default SSL is supposed to be for the entire ports tree, not only for
> a bunch of ports.
> 
> Second, yes that is the plan but it takes time and it is not that easy to make
> it happen :)

What are the current roadblocks to setting SSL_DEFAULT=openssl in 
ssl.mk? Is there a list of ports that don't compile with the ports openssl?