Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 07:36:41 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> Cc: "Kevin P. Neal" <kpn@neutralgood.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <31516A0C-250D-4A1E-BB66-AD2BC73384A1@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <20171126132532.f27hlvtnyjnkq7rr@ozzmosis.com> References: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1711250853410.73766@eboyr.pbz> <20171126032013.GA46813@neutralgood.org> <20171126132532.f27hlvtnyjnkq7rr@ozzmosis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 26 Nov, 2017, at 6:25, andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> wrote: >=20 > On Sat 2017-11-25 22:20:13 UTC-0500, Kevin P. Neal = (kpn@neutralgood.org) wrote: >=20 >> Is that the consensus to replace use of procmail with maildrop? >>=20 >> A little googling makes it look like maildrop has the easy = integration >> with sendmail just like procmail. But is maildrop going to be around = for >> the next, oh, 20 years like procmail was? >=20 > maildrop began circa 1999 and is part of the Courier Mail Server > software. procmail began circa 1990. Arguably both are due for a > modern replacement, although at least maildrop does not suffer from > vulnerabilities, afaik. Sieve (ex. dovecot-pigeonhole) is the modern replacement. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31516A0C-250D-4A1E-BB66-AD2BC73384A1>