From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 15 16:35:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA03219 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 May 1996 16:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jbrann.dialup.access.net (jbrann.dialup.access.net [166.84.193.118]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA03143 for ; Wed, 15 May 1996 16:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jbrann@localhost) by jbrann.dialup.access.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA26790; Wed, 15 May 1996 19:39:25 -0400 Message-Id: <199605152339.TAA26790@jbrann.dialup.access.net> Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940 & 1542 To: tpalmer@riverdale.edu Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 19:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org (freeq) In-Reply-To: <31989CE3.2E2B@riverdale.edu> from Tim Palmer at "May 14, 96 03:46:59 pm" From: John Brann Reply-To: John Brann Organisation: Not while I'm at home X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL13 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tim Palmer wrote... [... deleted] > > I've seen in a couple of readmes that 2.0.5 supports both the > Adaptec 2949 and the 3Com card, but my initial attempt failed - probing > ahc1 and zp0 both returned 0x0. There appears to be no ahc0 in my > kernel. The 1542 responded. So, I have two questions: > Do I need 2.1 Yes you do. 2940 support was added in 2.1, if this is a 2940UW you'll need something more recent still - probably stable has it. > Are there any problems with using these two SCSI cards? No - shouldn't be. > > Thank you very much for your time! > Tim Palmer > tpalmer@riverdale.edu > John -- Beavis and Butt-Head; Vladimir and Estragon for the '90s. finger jbrann@panix.com for pgp public key