Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:07:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wildebeest Licensing Message-ID: <1338592078824-5714091.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <86pqapmxmc.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <1SHqI5-0000qk-02@internal.tormail.net> <201204271645.18801.mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> <86y5pgn8la.fsf@ds4.des.no> <201204281652.28123.mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> <86pqapmxmc.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I would add- "Some strange license? Ditch it, we are not going to take chances." - Voice of Responsible (TM) corporate management. Seriously, why they should pay for legal expertise and still would not be sure of (practical) consequences? Popular/known licenses are hard enough... And if stake is high enough some obvious things easily can become debatable. But interesting idea nonetheless, I would like to read it again after feeling somewhat comfortable (If this time comes at all) with EU IP law and seek for possible problems. But it has theoretical value at best. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/BSD-license-tp5632493p5714091.html Sent from the freebsd-advocacy mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1338592078824-5714091.post>