From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct  5 16:49:36 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F3916A4AB;
	Thu,  5 Oct 2006 16:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
	[213.184.65.80])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB55043DED;
	Thu,  5 Oct 2006 16:48:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k95GmLSU072110;
	Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:48:21 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: (from eugen@localhost)
	by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k95GmLpe072109;
	Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:48:21 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:48:21 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20061005164821.GA71411@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
References: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> <4523916C.1080905@crc.u-strasbg.fr>
	<20061004163622.GA35298@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20061004173637.GA66349@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
	<20061005102923.N84384@fledge.watson.org>
	<20061005115140.GA47746@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
	<20061005130829.A46123@fledge.watson.org>
	<20061005144852.GA60575@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061005144852.GA60575@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/103841: [fdc] fdc(4) does not work (regression)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:49:36 -0000

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:48:52PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:

> > >It's definetely a regression from 4.11-STABLE that runs fine on this 
> > >system with ACPI fully enabled 
> 
> Hmm, I was wrong about 4.11 using ACPI - it does not use it here really,
> it uses "good old" APM.
> 
> > It would be interesting to know how 4.x probes the hardware vs. how it 
> > apperas in the 6.x dmesg.
> 
> 4.11-STABLE:
> 
> fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold
> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
> 
> 6.2-PRERELEASE:
> 
> fdc0: <floppy drive controller> port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f0 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
> fdc0: [FAST]
> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0

I managed to know that fdc_initial_reset() in sys/dev/fdc/fdc.c
probes my fdc controller as "Enhanced floppy controller" (ic_type==0x90) vs.
4.x's "NEC close". BTW, does in possible to obtain fdc's probe result vs.
fdc_acpi's result without addition of call to
"fdc_print_child(device_get_parent(dev), dev);" to fdc_initial_reset()?

I've forced sys/dev/fdc/fdc.c to probe my controller as "NEC clone"
by moving "case 0x90:" upwards to "case 0x80" in this function
but that does not help, no change in behavour was observed.

Eugene Grosbein