From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 03:44:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D219106566B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9613E8FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdq11 with SMTP id dq11so2348496wgb.31 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:44:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Se/scQCzzSauKdiTfdJqMqBg4sX2estKzp68Rzvg9Vc=; b=E9SXgCDZJMZ+BD3+x8Yq9Q9oLyMvrEABtXFW3jaV1iXRbrBYW/t8W1LKqsdv1ZoMsY CQelBbhDMqnVm6D/Kv8CR/kIPI24X3p3nROQ+E78Hd18b4K+WQLbtTOXJk3xxkMVNYQ1 /qxg3Ox7E1Kw4oZ8rvc14inshd4D7FQxywmqU= Received: by 10.180.90.225 with SMTP id bz1mr696387wib.5.1329450283742; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:44:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.15.90 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:44:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F3D1094.6030106@gmail.com> References: <20120215164722.GA1693@vniz.net> <4F3CD099.5030008@gmail.com> <20284.63426.601620.515768@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4F3D02C5.1080009@gmail.com> <20285.1581.499555.645684@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4F3D1094.6030106@gmail.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:44:13 -0500 Message-ID: To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWwNHgFzFQKADeOj0JE7VLEPcdPPZF9hojKe/1M4lpZYJMwhr3KswgIR3ySZQcr+qfLnTl Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Robert Huff Subject: Re: linux-f10-flashplugin11 not works for 9-stable (Linuxulator?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:44:45 -0000 Please do not double to post to emulation and ports. I have removed ports On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wro= te: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Given the number of people who have/had troub= le getting Flash >> to work, telling the average user that this is not covered by a >> common port version checking tool would be prudent. This is probably true but flash is not the only port with different versions in different ports. (e.g., gcc, python, and a few others) > Traditionally FreeBSD ports contain more than one flash version. I don't > know where this came from, maybe the previous version was left intact unt= il > Adobe/Macromedia fully moves to the next one resolving incompatibility > issues or something... Newer versions of Flash are not supported by older versions of the linuxila= tor -- Eitan Adler