Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:44:13 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Subject: Re: linux-f10-flashplugin11 not works for 9-stable (Linuxulator?) Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmzDSuUUnMVmrkctLBZ7V5wwLwNYvo3sGNP6cd6eVap0Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3D1094.6030106@gmail.com> References: <20120215164722.GA1693@vniz.net> <4F3CD099.5030008@gmail.com> <20284.63426.601620.515768@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4F3D02C5.1080009@gmail.com> <20285.1581.499555.645684@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4F3D1094.6030106@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Please do not double to post to emulation and ports. I have removed ports On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> wro= te: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Given the number of people who have/had troub= le getting Flash >> to work, telling the average user that this is not covered by a >> common port version checking tool would be prudent. This is probably true but flash is not the only port with different versions in different ports. (e.g., gcc, python, and a few others) > Traditionally FreeBSD ports contain more than one flash version. I don't > know where this came from, maybe the previous version was left intact unt= il > Adobe/Macromedia fully moves to the next one resolving incompatibility > issues or something... Newer versions of Flash are not supported by older versions of the linuxila= tor -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmzDSuUUnMVmrkctLBZ7V5wwLwNYvo3sGNP6cd6eVap0Q>