From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 16 18:22:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rjk191.rh.psu.edu (RJK191.rh.psu.edu [128.118.193.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DC714E32 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 18:22:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ray@rjk191.rh.psu.edu) Received: from localhost (ray@localhost) by rjk191.rh.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02676 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:20:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ray@rjk191.rh.psu.edu) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:20:48 -0500 (EST) From: Ray Kohler Reply-To: rjk191@psu.edu To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh weirdness In-Reply-To: <80t1g2$1c11$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 17 Nov 1999, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Ray Kohler wrote: > > > I investigated this today and found that my Eterm sets status to > > ^J. > > This is clearly a bug that should be investigated. > (I don't use Eterm.) I agree. I've also used Eterm 0.8.10 (the problem is there too), but don't now since 0.8.9 is the version in the ports and I've developed an aversion to compiling things myself . It is noteworthy to mention that I used Eterm under Linux very recently and this problem doesn't exist there (does Linxu even have status?). -- Ray Kohler To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message