From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 26 09:13:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ACC106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:13:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9788FC16
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:13:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so1044359bkc.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=1YPZGyfM2d3UUoUgw7AJNsCYf7Ki0v21rSA/xUUvE90=;
	b=U4WrKr+E7K0YUt1Iix6cSg3hFP+PG6ftseOm07Xyf/LydUMN+GdteV9+gYB26J3hAI
	48NPjX38nslrTbGIvKgn/2GToPRGqxQWXps3eyIjZriOBr733GHGLOPHuva2TfPVd8dD
	FXEMciYWZvoYBQE08FneiacAuh4syzvGRPeAJx2o9dPtW9ULyoBjOo52ChjscCFtNq1a
	EwrTZ8kTGr9z4N+8LHyBBrbV/jLCii0RbcieK6sej4Uzzn3+Ql/iS1nAX+VcRs+0p+2B
	b18TA8aUSchHtkU8J0QUDuboJtSf6OjXmaGih/COjoZ5Qjb9jUsA2ertlcJznLhzNGnI
	fLBg==
Received: by 10.204.132.80 with SMTP id a16mr13803435bkt.82.1343293985043;
	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from green.tandem.local (24-119-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net.
	[95.132.119.24])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c18sm14063390bkv.8.2012.07.26.02.13.03
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50110A1D.3080900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:13:01 +0300
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120605 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <1343228557.99992.androidMobile@web140705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<5010FC21.3020207@gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1207261053390.14265@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207261053390.14265@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:13:06 -0000

Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> 2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and
>> compilation
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> this is simply not true.

This is simply not the point. Let's not start it again. The question was 
clearly about compilation speed where clang outperforms gcc by far. As 
for execution speed for now there's no clear winner:

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA5Nzc

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.