From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 28 17:06:50 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA01735 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 17:06:50 -0800 Received: from star-gate.com (hasty.vip.best.com [204.156.141.143]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA01729 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 17:06:44 -0800 Received: from localhost.mcs.com (localhost.mcs.com [127.0.0.1]) by star-gate.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA11150; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 17:00:47 GMT Date: Tue, 28 Mar 1995 17:00:47 GMT From: Amancio Hasty Message-Id: <199503281700.RAA11150@star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: star-gate.com: Host localhost.mcs.com didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6alpha 2/16/95 To: "Dick Bednar" cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Mail... Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Can anyone lend a hand: ) Amancio Date: Tue, 28 Mar 1995 17:00:45 +0000 From: Amancio Hasty > >>> "Dick Bednar" said: > > in c.u.b.f.misc mentioned a university that used 4 FreeBSD's for 2000+ ma ils > . > > > > My group is grappling blindly with the prospect of providing mail to 25,0 00 > > students. Sadly, our Unix experience is limited, and much of it is > > out-of-date. Did your comment mean to imply that an Intel based FreeBSD > > providing what people would generally think of as acceptable response can > > support 500 mail accounts? Somehow I don't think we want to set up and > > administer 50 machines. Or, maybe we do and just are too dumb to know it . > > > > Or, was their setup based on number of serial ports for shell account acc ess > > as the limiting factor rather than raw computing support? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Yo > > > --QAA11064.796409790/star-gate.com-- >