Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:53:04 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 bonnies can stop disk activity permanently Message-ID: <dl4qi2t4ms9gp44crfa0marascvoo93grf@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <452AC4EB.8000006@samsco.org> References: <45297DA2.4000509@fluffles.net> <20061010051216.G814@epsplex.bde.org> <452AB55D.9090607@samsco.org> <ltgli2hqprmfqq3ttahrtbppj4l3dkt4b7@4ax.com> <452AC4EB.8000006@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:53:47 -0600, in sentex.lists.freebsd.fs you wrote: >Mike Tancsa wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:47:25 -0600, in sentex.lists.freebsd.fs you >> wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>>this is only a crude hack. I get around this right now by not using a >>>disklabel or fdisk table on arrays where I value speed. For those, I >>>just put a filesystem directly on the array, and boot off of a small >>>system disk. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> How is that done ? just newfs -O2 -U /dev/da0 ? > >Yup. Hi, Is this going to work in most/all cases ? In other words, how to I make sure the file system I lay down is indeed properly / optimally aligned with the underlying structure ? ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dl4qi2t4ms9gp44crfa0marascvoo93grf>