Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Mar 2001 01:17:43 -0000
From:      "BSD Blood" <bsdblood@hotmail.com>
To:        burnscharlesn@hotmail.com, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sendmail vs other MTAs
Message-ID:  <F199hEUsebmspH2q6Dq0000018c@hotmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How about the documentation for qmail? Is it sufficient?


>From: "Charles Burns" <burnscharlesn@hotmail.com>
>To: bsdblood@hotmail.com, questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: sendmail vs other MTAs
>Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:07:25 -0700
>
>You might consider qmail. Many FreeBSD people don't seem to like its' 
>license very much, but it is a good MTA.
>It is extremely secure. As the author brags on his website 
>(http://www.qmail.org/top.html) there have been several cash rewards over 
>the years offered for anybody that could find a security hole in qmail. 
>None were ever claimed.
>Sendmail, OTOH, has been the poster child for remote root exploits for 
>years. I have not heard of any such exploits for quite a while though.
>qmail is also said to be faster by far than Sendmail by far, but this 
>probably won't matter unless you have hundreds of thousands of messages per 
>day to process.
>The author makes some rather extreme claims about qmail, such as the claim 
>that under BSD with no softupdates and no async, qmail is "crashproof". He 
>gives tips for making mail reliable and then says "You may encounter people 
>who dispute one or more of the above statements. Those people don't know 
>what they're talking about."
>In any case, qmail is used by several big servers (as is Sendmail). These 
>include Hotmail (unless MS has finally been able to make Exchange Server 
>handle the load without crashing), Slashdot, RedHat, and others.
>
>>From: "BSD Blood" <bsdblood@hotmail.com>
>>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>Subject: sendmail vs other MTAs
>>Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:50:17 -0000
>>
>>Hello. I've been using FreeBSD for 4 months. What are your opinions on
>>sendmail compared to the other MTAs like postfix,qmail, etc. on FreeBSD.
>>Which one is more stable, easy to configure, secure, etc. ? I need to 
>>decide
>>which one to use as my SMTP server. I have little experience with 
>>sendmail,
>>but I don't really like it because I find it too difficult to configure 
>>and
>>there are just too much documentation to read.
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>
>>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F199hEUsebmspH2q6Dq0000018c>