From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 27 6: 3:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7833515624 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:03:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12DpUX-00053o-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:01:45 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Eric Jacoboni Cc: Matt Miller , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail on current In-reply-to: Your message of "26 Jan 2000 20:33:31 +0100." <87k8kw4ohg.fsf@alex.titine.fr.eu.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:01:45 +0200 Message-ID: <19455.948981705@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 26 Jan 2000 20:33:31 +0100, Eric Jacoboni wrote: > in CURRENT, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symlink to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > (see man mailwrapper). No, it's a hard link. I only mention this because your explanation makes it sound like mailwrapper generates much more overhead than it really does: > In CURRENT, the command 'sendmail' runs the mailwrapper program which, > in turn, runs the correct ones according to /etc/mail/mailer.conf (there's > an exemple in 'man mailer.conf'). Anyway, this guy's problem is just the location of mailer.conf, which you got right, so he should be fine. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message