From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 27 12:36:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from hand.dotat.at (sfo-gw.covalent.net [207.44.198.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE8537B718 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:36:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fanf@dotat.at) Received: from fanf by hand.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.20 #3) id 14XqqP-00048R-00; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:35:37 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:35:37 +0000 From: Tony Finch To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Design a journalled file system Message-ID: <20010227203537.L609@hand.dotat.at> References: <20010227192923.I609@hand.dotat.at> <200102272017.NAA00440@usr05.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102272017.NAA00440@usr05.primenet.com> Organization: Covalent Technologies, Inc Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert wrote: > >Please compare sections 11 and 12 of the GPL with the BSD >liability disclaimer, in the context of section 6 sentence 3 >of the GPL ("You may not impose further restrictions..."). Hmm, well I fail to spot the differences but then IANAL. >Realize also that not all of FreeBSD is under the 3 clause >license, and that embedded systems manufacturers frequently >licensedrivers for which source can not be legally distributed >to third parties (which would put the code in violation of >section 6 sentence 2 of the GPL). Well they have that problem anyway. I was talking purely about linking BSD and GPL code because of your comment about "the GPL disallowing distribution of the code with non-GPL'ed code" which AFAIK is wrong. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at CROMARTY: NORTH 5 TO 7. SNOW SHOWERS. GOOD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message