From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 03:01:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394B2106564A for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7538FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so2500418wwi.31 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wg9QGC9bJP/SVKpW8J/hwQ2Q2C8QoTGqFdoS5dFMlxg=; b=DQqz2nPg/Foruox0f5lESw0TC3UJzRi+c2MSh6HTjeQTfMYCvLE7AWaD6Mc9VaBYFo YpWW/79R/JKji2bD3RF8zTWg65r4SbfxJt1nCDdYqYBTcZe1X4TVY1So0JeKohU++gs+ nsSirpZOOmqeVyO6aojYoHFKYMTVyVp6x90d4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.5 with SMTP id o5mr509353weo.51.1314932493939; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.74.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:01:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <110707658.891774.1306501788477.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:01:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Rick Macklem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: newnfs user setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:01:36 -0000 On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Rick Macklem wrot= e: >>> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Rick Macklem wrote: >>> ... >>> > =A0http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/dtrace.patch >>> > >>> Hmm. Is it just me? >>> Trying to test the patch I get: >>> >>> (fs)(root) patch -C < dtrace.patch >>> Hmm... I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. >>> >> Here's how I apply the patch. >> - download dtrace.patch to somewhere, lets say /tmp, then >> # cd /usr/src/sys =A0<-- sys subdirectory of a current head, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 which you don't mind messing= up >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 doesn't have to be at /usr/s= rc/sys, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 of course. >> # patch -p1 < /tmp/dtrace.patch >> >> rick >> > > What's the status on this patch? It would be nice to get dtrace/newnfs > going for 9.0...it's not too late, right? > > I'll test the patch too BTW :) > > -Brandon > So it looks like the patch was committed to HEAD, but the bits to support the New NFS implementation were never flipped on -- is that for a good reason? -Brandon