Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:56:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201035] Accept more than one maintainer for ports (and issues in bugzilla) Message-ID: <bug-201035-13-7DHfWxWLEf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201035-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201035-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201035 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Bug Tracker |Ports Framework Summary|Accept more than one |Accept more than one |maintainer for PR and |maintainer for ports (and |ports. |issues in bugzilla) Keywords| |feature Version|unspecified |Latest Product|Services |Ports & Packages CC| |freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. | |org, koobs@FreeBSD.org Assignee|bugmeister@FreeBSD.org |portmgr@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- This is a feature request, and will require some initial and further thought and discussion about: * how it could/should be implemented * what the benefits and risks might be * potential impact on consumers (users and systems) that utilize MAINTAINER in its current form. This is definitely within the remit of the Ports Management team, thus will be re-classified/assigned accordingly. I would strongly recommend/suggest you create (along with feedback from others) a detailed proposal summary in Gist or Wiki page format, that goes over the details. A format similar to a Python Enhancement Proposal (PEP) would be a good starting point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201035-13-7DHfWxWLEf>