From owner-freebsd-current Sat Aug 31 15:18: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C6D37B400 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F00B43E75 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:18:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7VMHXcV098479; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:17:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7VMHWtX098478; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:17:32 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Langer , Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with "using namespace std;" Message-ID: <20020831221732.GA98460@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <20020828021006.D1412@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <3D6C1F76.30B458A5@mindspring.com> <20020828063614.GA88426@dragon.nuxi.com> <3D713DD0.8FFA608A@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D713DD0.8FFA608A@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:06:08PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > In general, though, the answer is that "3.1 sucks and 2.9x > > > does not". 8-). > > > > Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience. > > > > > Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy > > > non-maintenance release level GCC; alternately, wait for 3.3. > > > > What in the world are you trying to say?? > > "non-maintenance release"??? Why do you think 3.2 is buggy?? > > Because rather than leaving it alone for a while, they are already > planning a 3.3. 8-). > > And comments on this list to that effect. I don't follow. The GCC group branches previous to a release and makes an initial + point releases from it. How is this different from FreeBSD? (other than they branch much before the .0 release and we don't). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message