From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Mar 29 18:30:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96494D2497C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50444386C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n21so20343400qta.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pIYkbktBC0RuPJ8dOTKtmdz89JJDpV+6IAXHv7n+s/Q=; b=UmWjPpk0oZ2LcW4vDX8tiVF34NcNaAqfZn1Ab7kKud/cjlYt3zSCbTylYCiY0oWcYQ ic0tC/D0n1mUjR8scawgu+r4F2qJGoGg8VaJCZa5l9fFW4jQbJLgmWq/dBJK6D/esAlV b1Fy7p+dOh5jC8DMp20riQIXc7IZynqEbuYUs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pIYkbktBC0RuPJ8dOTKtmdz89JJDpV+6IAXHv7n+s/Q=; b=iIeFozq5Ou0g51e8UM4rFGYrwtH90dbQONcdnY6x0B69fE9OqukmcL+gr4c1qxifQn oorok9qqSRlV/8dAtdycODHUV34nk2yvDiqK1t3A57mZq7w9rCxqCw5NR9cfWAOFCFQF NtPsCZ7R9smcFfMeiQWJ/KrM6GoHTlP3nkM9M3HqtnCIy3ROK3BHFUVR9SFbM6vXA6iY 7Wlk0na3Vy7HdxKK2r7A0hkRMKckZuCcPSbZYt8xBJAjFGsnKCHHQuPldY4LaNxM7mIE JZVRJe5cruVKxgZYqiW87vwZgyyE5w1TF/yVIX/ylhb5yAtbb5lrZw/O1VCs3EdDvFM/ BTzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3FI8o4zJ8OGGSNkcBe52vLEeBgZgwerqgIVaZfXKG5hubIQQDNuRuQvEcrpG/nhw== X-Received: by 10.200.54.247 with SMTP id b52mr2079316qtc.160.1490812230090; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.219] (179-240-134-47.3g.claro.net.br. [179.240.134.47]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k51sm5426196qtf.31.2017.03.29.11.30.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: gcc for aarch64 To: Andreas Tobler References: <5eb49766-e5af-d89f-b4f6-a0d655a3859a@bsd.com.br> <43c04670-4913-325f-98ff-ab5502afa0a2@fgznet.ch> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" From: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:30:22 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <43c04670-4913-325f-98ff-ab5502afa0a2@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:30:31 -0000 Em 29/03/2017 15:26, Andreas Tobler escreveu: > On 29.03.17 20:22, Warner Losh wrote: >> The in-tree gcc compiler doesn't have any aarch64 support. Out of tree >> ones should be supported though. Or at least it should be possible to >> try to build and see what blows up... Most developers use clang on >> aarch64, so there's bound to be a few surprises. >> >> Warner >> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Otacílio >> wrote: >>> Dear, is anyone using gcc in aarch64 architecture? The last time I >>> tried to >>> compile the gcc I received a message that the architecture was not >>> supported. > > [pine64:~] andreast% pkg info |grep gcc > gcc5-devel-5.4.1.s20170321 GNU Compiler Collection 5 > gcc6-devel-6.3.1.s20170323 GNU Compiler Collection 6 > gcc7-devel-7.0.1.s20170319 GNU Compiler Collection 7 > > Also release gcc5 and gcc6 are supported. > > Everything is in gcc trunk, gcc6 and gcc5 branch too. > > gcc49 is not supported. We hopefully will switch soon lang/gcc from > gcc4.9.4 to gcc5.4.1 > > Andreas > Thank you by your hint. I was trying only with lang/gcc because I supposed that this version was the one with the best support. []'s -Otacilio