From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Apr 10  9:30: 4 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5302637B8C3
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA93878;
	Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200004101630.JAA93878@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Subject: Re: bin/17864: PATCH: sys/resource.h needs sys/time.h for struct timeval 
Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/17864; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/17864: PATCH: sys/resource.h needs sys/time.h for struct timeval 
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:26:51 +0200

 On Sat, 08 Apr 2000 09:10:03 MST, Garrett Wollman wrote:
 
 >  <sys/time.h> is a documented prerequisite of <sys/resource.h>:
 
 Always?  Is gettimeofday(2) wrong, or is this a red herring?
 
 Ciao,
 Sheldon.
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message