From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 22:25:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6FA106566C; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 12-207-105-211.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26FE14D969; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E41B3C5.80108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:25:09 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sahil Tandon References: <201108091348.p79DmYFa095351@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110809135332.GA52137@over-yonder.net> <4E418DC6.7040708@FreeBSD.org> <20110809220138.GA274@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20110809220138.GA274@magic.hamla.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steven Kreuzer , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , "Matthew D. Fuller" , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc Makefile ports/textproc/ack Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25:13 -0000 On 08/09/2011 15:01, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 21:16:23 +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 9 August 2011 20:43, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 08/09/2011 12:18, Chris Rees wrote: >>>> On 9 August 2011 17:50, Steven Kreuzer >>>> wrote: >>>>> I missed it when I first looked to see if this was a port. I >>>>> removed mine from the tree >>>>> >>>> >>>> Would anyone object if I looked at adding danfe's grep suggestion >>>> to addport ? We have similar checks in rmport... >>> >>> Not sure exactly what you're proposing. If you're talking about >>> humans looking to see if a port exists already then 'cd /usr/ports >>> && make search name=foo' is probably an easier way to do that. >> >> I was thinking of (like the PRs open for $port of rmport) >> >> Ports named like ack: textproc/p5-ack >> >> Are you sure you wish to continue [Y/N]? > > I think this is a reasonable idea - please do not be discouraged from > trying. I sincerely hope you're not referring to my question as a possible source of discouragement. It certainly was not intended to be. > Us humans are imperfect, and it would be nice to have another > check if it is implemented in a useful manner. Looking forward to the > patch. I agree that this kind of functionality is a good addition to addport, the only questions are "What is the best way to accomplish it?" and "Might there be a more generally useful approach?" Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/