From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:48:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B178D16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E7743D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29909 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2006 13:48:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4811628423; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:48:03 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: shih@math.jussieu.fr References: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 10 Jan 2006 08:48:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> Message-ID: <443bjwtcrx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 -0000 > What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? The package description covers that. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/sysutils/portsnap/pkg-descr?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain