From owner-cvs-all  Thu Feb  4 15:18:09 1999
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA09494
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:18:09 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from veda.is (veda.is [193.4.230.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA09420;
          Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:17:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from adam@veda.is)
Received: (from adam@localhost)
	by veda.is (8.9.0/8.9.0) id XAA20180;
	Thu, 4 Feb 1999 23:17:25 GMT
From: Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Message-Id: <199902042317.XAA20180@veda.is>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC
In-Reply-To: <21047.918169741@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Feb 4, 99 03:09:01 pm"
To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 23:17:24 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: adam@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Don't also get me wrong - if you're just marking it as a 'merge
> candidate' in the commit message for your own benefit to be used in
> some later sweep, that's fine too, I just wanted to make sure you
> weren't marking it for what you thought was someone else's benefit. :)

Probably the approval request should have gone directly to the release
engineer, but off the top of my head I didn't remember who that is this
time. Do we have release@freebsd.org, releng@freebsd.org or similar?

Adam

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message