From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 13:42:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5191065670 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@stangl.us) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C288FC28 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ED4B8C3 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:27:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stangl.us Received: from stangl.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scout.stangl.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSkzXGOv9hu5 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:27:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D8BEAB8C0; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:27:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:27:05 -0500 From: Alex Stangl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101021132705.GA93895@scout.stangl.us> References: <20101019074615.GA2183@current.Sisis.de> <20101020022946.GA23035@thought.org> <20101020052601.GA1977@current.Sisis.de> <4cbe9e9a.3qT7q8JUqJxSD8/V%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101020165526.GA25310@thought.org> <4CBF21EB.1080003@tundraware.com> <20101020194605.GA78565@stainmore> <4CBF4CB4.6070902@qeng-ho.org> <20101021133844.235fdc72@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101021133844.235fdc72@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: Greybeards (Re: Netbooks & BSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:42:41 -0000 On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:38:44PM +0100, RW wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:10:28 +0100 > Arthur Chance wrote: > > 50s) had the experience of programming microcode on a machine by > > inserting brass slugs for 0s and ferrite slugs for 1s on a pin board. > > I wonder why it was brass/ferrite rather than brass/empty or > ferrite/empty. I was wondering the same thing. I suspect one of them may be equivalent to empty electrically, however this way is less errorprone, explicitly populating each slot, rather than relying upon empty, which could in fact be a mistaken omission. Alex