Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:36:16 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: Eric Browning <ericbrowning@skaggscatholiccenter.org> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Performance difference between UFS and ZFS with NFS Message-ID: <DE0E67DF-F0C9-4575-936E-E6A6E8EE951F@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <CAM=5oeCoj63hLmJq6hU6VKwf2bnGgbYNNY-yH9LisEs_wf4Bqg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAM=5oeCoj63hLmJq6hU6VKwf2bnGgbYNNY-yH9LisEs_wf4Bqg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 19.11.2013 um 02:16 schrieb Eric Browning = <ericbrowning@skaggscatholiccenter.org>: > Some background: > -Two identical servers, dual AMD Athlon 6220's 16 cores total @ 3Ghz, > -64GB ram each server > -Four Intel DC S3700 800GB SSDs for primary storage, each server. > -FreeBSD 9 stable as of 902503 > -ZFS v28 and later updated to feature flags (v29?) > -LSI 9200-8i controller > -Intel I350T4 nic (only one port being used currently) using all four = in > LACP overtaxed the server's NFS queue from what we found out making = the > server basically unusable. Have you tried to use FreeNAS and post in their performance-forum? There=92s a ton of information in that forum.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DE0E67DF-F0C9-4575-936E-E6A6E8EE951F>