Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 13:42:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277799] libusb should be updated Message-ID: <bug-277799-19105-yw0CoAX7V2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-277799-19105@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-277799-19105@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277799 Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|usb@FreeBSD.org |emaste@freebsd.org --- Comment #3 from Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> --- AFAICT OpenOCD's 1.0.16 requirement comes from libjaylink and was introduced in: https://gitlab.zapb.de/libjaylink/libjaylink/-/commit/4959f4e18a2bb0de21abe= 66bbfe403b56f599856 which introduced use of libusb_get_port_numbers libusb_get_bus_number The second one has existed forever, and it is apparently the addition of libusb_get_port_numbers that added the 1.0.16 dependency. libusb_get_port_numbers was introduced in libusb in commit 4d7789be7e317fb2e89557f959c1a1a69cc01b26 Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Date: Fri May 17 10:36:32 2013 +0200 core: Add a new public libusb_get_port_numbers function This new function replaces the now deprecated libusb_get_port_path function, as that is the only function operating on a libusb_device which also ta= kes a libusb_context, which is rather inconsistent. Note we will keep libusb_get_port_path around in the 1.0.x for the forseeable future for ABI compatibility reasons, but it should not be used in any = new code. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> and in FreeBSD in commit a9205626a7e2f89486e637d6187ff99c17efeb10 Author: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri Jun 7 13:45:58 2013 +0000 Add libusb_get_port_numbers libusbx deprecated libusb_get_port_path and replaced it with libusb_get_port_numbers. The latter omits an extra parameter which was unused in the FreeBSD implementation anyway. (Huh, I don't remember this.) That said, bumping what we report to 1.0.16 seems reasonable enough; we can fault in any missing but required functionality. Change added to Phabricator review and exp-run requested in see-also PR. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277799-19105-yw0CoAX7V2>