From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 14 16:04:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B318F16A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:04:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web14612.mail.yahoo.com (web14612.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.173.219])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68B0143D58
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:04:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from plageotakes@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040914160435.56075.qmail@web14612.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [64.105.80.94] by web14612.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:04:35 PDT
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: peter lageotakes <plageotakes@yahoo.com>
To: Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se>, questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040913211740.Y71085@pluring.snowfall.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:04:35 -0000


--- Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I read the article on sys admin magazine
>
(http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm)
> where they
> benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD
> regarding High-Performance
> Network Applications. This article is from 2001 and
> covers FreeBSD 4.2.
> Anyhow, FreeBSD ended last which feels quiet
> strange, is there anyone that
> has any new benchmarking data on how FreeBSD 5
> compares ?
> 
> / Stefan
> 
> --
> Stefan Cars
> Snowfall Communications
> http://www.snowfall.se
> Tel: +46 (0)18 430 80 50 - Direct: +46 (0)18 430 80
> 51
> Mobile: +46 (0)708 44 36 00 - Fax: +46 (0)708 44 36
> 04
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
There was a follow up to the article. However, this
article is way too old.  Others have responded with
more recent benchmarks that show the current state of
FreeBSD.

Here is the follow up (for historical reasons)
Which OS is Fastest -- FreeBSD Follow-Up
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1147/sam0108q/0108q.htm

Pete


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail