From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 18 12:19:28 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928C7106566C
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:19:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ben@wanderview.com)
Received: from mail.wanderview.com (mail.wanderview.com [66.92.166.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD228FC19
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from xykon.in.wanderview.com (xykon.in.wanderview.com [10.76.10.152])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mail.wanderview.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAICJHbI071873
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:19:17 GMT (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com>
In-Reply-To: <86skccukyg.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:19:17 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2F1FD10F-91BB-41A1-919D-531A342C8113@wanderview.com>
References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com>
	<41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com>
	<19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org>
	<8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com>
	<4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org>
	<BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200@wanderview.com>
	<4B036BD3.4020900@FreeBSD.org>
	<568A6428-A2DD-49D4-B043-455273A7902E@wanderview.com>
	<86skccukyg.fsf@ds4.des.no>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.76.20.1
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:19:28 -0000


On Nov 18, 2009, at 6:32 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:

> Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com> writes:
>> =46rom the log for r88893 of /usr/src/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk I think =
its
>> intended that the module variables are related to ports in some way:
>>=20
>>  Move initialization of the MKMODULESENV envorinoment to kern.pre.mk
>>  from kern.post.mk so port makefiles can augment it.
>=20
> Ports, not ports.  I mean, ports as in "I was bored this weekend and
> ported FreeBSD to MMIX", not as in "I was bored this weekend and =
created
> a port for an MMIX virtual machine".

Ah.  Thanks for the clarification.  That does make more sense.  For some =
reason I was thinking these variables might be relevant to ports like =
x11/nvidia-driver, etc.

Sorry for the confusion.

- Ben=