From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 09:03:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EBD106566B for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@vnode.se) Received: from mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [62.119.52.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684858FC1A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.vnode.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAF5E3F07A; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vnode.se Received: from mail.vnode.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1RnFj0Y-s1n; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from goofy01.vnodelab.local (jd.benders.se [212.247.52.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAB8AE3F079; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:09 +0200 From: Joel Dahl To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20120412090309.GK26895@goofy01.vnodelab.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:03:23 -0000 On 12-04-2012 8:26, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular > with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that > the Handbook lists it first. > > Two patches: > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/move-portupgrade.diff -- move > the portupgrade section to the bottom > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/deprecate-portupgrade.diff -- > add a note to suggest it's a bad idea to use it. > > Rendered at http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/rendered/portupgrade.html > > Thoughts? Anyone want to risk approving it? Good idea. I'd like to see Portmaster first in the list though, and not Portmanager. -- Joel