Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:09 +0200 From: Joel Dahl <joel@vnode.se> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade Message-ID: <20120412090309.GK26895@goofy01.vnodelab.local> In-Reply-To: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12-04-2012 8:26, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular > with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that > the Handbook lists it first. > > Two patches: > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/move-portupgrade.diff -- move > the portupgrade section to the bottom > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/deprecate-portupgrade.diff -- > add a note to suggest it's a bad idea to use it. > > Rendered at http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/rendered/portupgrade.html > > Thoughts? Anyone want to risk approving it? Good idea. I'd like to see Portmaster first in the list though, and not Portmanager. -- Joel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120412090309.GK26895>