From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 21:17:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF56106566C for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp144.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp144.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078A8FC1D for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp34.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B4A0BB8101; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:17:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp34.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id AF319380F52; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:17:22 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:17:16 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: Polytropon , Arthur Chance Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Easiest desktop BSD distro In-Reply-To: <20110331191001.3e0877e3.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Easiest desktop BSD distro X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:17:34 -0000 On 3/31/11 1:10 PM, "Polytropon" wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:33:09 +0100, Arthur Chance >wrote: >>On 03/31/11 17:06, Arthur Chance wrote: >>> On 03/30/11 23:00, Polytropon wrote: >>>> There is a project called VirtualBSD that developed a >>>> FreeBSD system image that can be used with VirtualBox. >>> >>> Nitpick: the web site says >>> >>> > VirtualBSD is a virtual appliance for VMware >>> >>Following myself up, Polytropon was technically correct as the FAQ says >> > VirtualBSD is somewhat compatible with VirtualBox, but not right away >> > and not easily. >>but I suspect the level of effort needed is going to put people off >>trying it. Isn't VMware more common than VBox on most systems anyway? > >Thanks for stating that; in fact, I was confusing VMWare >and VirtualBox while typing. :-) I've no experience with VirtualBSD. But I can say that VBox comes with host configs for FreeBSD 32 and 64 clients. Yesterday I fed the FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE Disk 1 ISO into VBox and it installed very nicely. Network even came up with DHCP.