Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:58:36 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kernel thread as real threads..
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201458110.1773-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:

> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >>Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or
> >>kernel visible way?  Is this something that is really all that
> >>important?
> >
> >
> > Only in a non-portable way.  See pthread_set_name_np(3).
> >
>
> Well, for the time being, I can't see why we can't specifically
> name kthreads and use the process name for user threads.

I think that makes more sense anyway.

-- 
DE




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201458110.1773-100000>