From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed Jan 17  3:16:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5659937B400; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:16:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f0HBGJC14809;
	Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:16:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:16:19 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: HEADS-UP: await/asleep removal imminent
Message-ID: <20010117031618.K7240@fw.wintelcom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Please trim cc's as appropriate.

I have a patch here that removes await/asleep from the kernel API.

http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/noasleep.diff

Matt Dillon implemented alseep/await quite some time ago and the
only thing that's using it is ata.  In order to clean up some of
the schduler and vm system I'm removing support for it.

Peter Wemm and I suspect that ata doesn't need it.  Right now I'm
running several make -j128 buildworlds and buildkernels with this
patch to catch any ata problems.

Now would be a good time to test this delta for stability reasons.

I plan on applying the delta within a few days.

thanks,
-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message