From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 13 23:13:49 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA26388
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 23:13:49 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA26383
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 23:13:48 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA19306; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 23:06:51 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199510140606.XAA19306@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: DOS Emulation under FreeBSD
To: mrami@minerva.cis.yale.edu
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 23:06:51 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com, root@synthcom.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951014020018.373F-100000@mramirez.sy.yale.edu> from "Marc Ramirez" at Oct 14, 95 02:01:52 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 492       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > I think there is room for a large contribution at the DOSEMU level,
> > both in making it work better on BSD and in virtual machine abstraction
> > on the order of the WIn95/WinNT interface.
> 
> Does this imply that DOSEMU works partially on FreeBSD?

It works on NetBSD, sorta.  Someone implied it worked on FreeBSD.

It *should* work on FreeBSD.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.