From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  9 18:24:57 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3468E7D7
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 May 2013 18:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.208.146])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0008EA30
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 May 2013 18:24:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.151.188])
 by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8214B10229EB;
 Thu,  9 May 2013 15:24:55 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from hub.org ([200.46.208.146])
 by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.151.188]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 85924-10; Thu,  9 May 2013 18:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.5.250.150] (remote.ilcs.sd63.bc.ca [142.31.148.2])
 by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 75B6010229EA;
 Thu,  9 May 2013 15:24:54 -0300 (ADT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <op.wwia5vd034t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 11:24:53 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <030E4A04-D597-49BD-8979-27C3EFB6D276@hub.org>
References: <834305228.13772274.1367527941142.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu>
 <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org>
 <20130502221857.GJ32659@physics.umn.edu>
 <420165EE-BBBF-4E97-B476-58FFE55A52AA@hub.org>
 <op.wwia5vd034t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net>
To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 18:24:57 -0000


FYI =85 I just installed Solaris 11 onto the same hardware and ran the =
same test =85 so far, I'm seeing:

Linux @ ~30s
Solaris @ ~44s

OpenBSD @ ~200s
FreeBSD @ ~240s

I've even tried FreeBSD 8.3 just to see if maybe its as 'newish' issue =85=
 same as 9.x =85 I could see Linux 'cutting corners', but Oracle/Solaris =
too =85 ?

On 2013-05-03, at 04:50 , Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> wrote:

> On Thu, 02 May 2013 18:43:17 -0500, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> =
wrote:
>=20
>> Hadn't thought to do so with Linux, but =85
>> Linux =85=85. 20732ms, 20117ms, 20935ms, 20130ms, 20560ms
>> FreeBSD .. 28996ms, 24794ms, 24702ms, 23311ms, 24153ms
>=20
> Please make sure both platforms are using similar atime settings. I =
think most distros use ext4 with diratime by default. I'd just do =
noatime on both platforms to be safe.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"