Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:31:26 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: Giovanni, "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>, Trematerra <gianni@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: improve cx_lowest logic Message-ID: <1341937886.2573.3.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20120711000506.E42038@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org> <20120711000506.E42038@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 07:27 -0700, Ian Smith wrote: > I wonder if that explains why setting C3 on aforesaid T23 has no > effect > (in terms of dev.cpu.0.cx_usage indicating any time spent in C3) > unless > the machine happened to be booted up on battery, in which case C3 is > shown as working whenever its enabled, by power_profile or manually? > > silly question, did you set these in /etc/rc.conf ?? performance_cx_lowest="LOW" economy_cx_lowest="LOW" Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1341937886.2573.3.camel>