From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 10 16:32:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765D3106566C; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3778FC17; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q6AGVQZw098478; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:31:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1341937888; bh=VMDUHLN0JDC7mb1KtQThwryCcHMyZ1RBGdugA/uKOcQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xDFsTm3oZxszMV+aPZ6RQ1D1RbpPXnhe6nROKa9vW/hSeZZDgWbC1q/yPOYYslr61 x2r8JcASvh02mB8oOAwd5wuNObZejSwtLRsW1A3gzBtllJ9FQI9stSaXM8WT7zCGqa 33pAh7uvK5c8PXqAR8mcof+9+n/1QXdF9clz0Wwc= From: Sean Bruno To: Ian Smith In-Reply-To: <20120711000506.E42038@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org> <20120711000506.E42038@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:31:26 -0700 Message-ID: <1341937886.2573.3.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+ X-CLX-ID: 937887001 Cc: Giovanni, "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , Vitaly Magerya , Andriy Gapon , Trematerra Subject: Re: improve cx_lowest logic X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:32:30 -0000 On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 07:27 -0700, Ian Smith wrote: > I wonder if that explains why setting C3 on aforesaid T23 has no > effect > (in terms of dev.cpu.0.cx_usage indicating any time spent in C3) > unless > the machine happened to be booted up on battery, in which case C3 is > shown as working whenever its enabled, by power_profile or manually? > > silly question, did you set these in /etc/rc.conf ?? performance_cx_lowest="LOW" economy_cx_lowest="LOW" Sean