From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 23 15:38:45 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661411065672
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brett@lariat.net)
Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2238FC18
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:38:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brett@lariat.net)
Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net
	[66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00486;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:38:40 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200903231538.JAA00486@lariat.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:36:57 -0600
To: "Luiz Otavio O Souza" <lists.br@gmail.com>, <net@freebsd.org>
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>
In-Reply-To: <87153F88702C4FBCA3FC799082960C45@adnote989>
References: <200903222114.PAA17884@lariat.net>
	<87153F88702C4FBCA3FC799082960C45@adnote989>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Problems with inward PPTP tunnel
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:38:45 -0000

Luis:

It looks as if bin/130159 ought to fix the problem I am having. I 
see that it sets the "IFP" flag in the route update request and 
specifies the interface, which ought to be what is needed. I am not 
seeing problems with proxy ARP, but that may be because I am 
running 7.1-RELEASE and not -STABLE. The patch in bin/131250 should 
probably also be committed to keep things working.

--Brett Glass

At 05:06 AM 3/23/2009, Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote:

>Brett,
>
>I've fixed these two issues with ppp(8), please check the PRs: 
>bin/130159 and bin/131250.
>
>If it works for you please let a note and maybe someone commit this.
>
>Best regards,
>Luiz